{"id":2108,"date":"2018-09-25T09:34:00","date_gmt":"2018-09-25T09:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test946983.live-website.com\/?p=2108"},"modified":"2019-12-03T11:20:15","modified_gmt":"2019-12-03T11:20:15","slug":"uzbekistan-denies-rumors-of-100000-som-denomination","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=2108","title":{"rendered":"Uzbekistan denies rumors of 100,000-som denomination"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class='has-larger-font-size'>\n<div class=\"blog-entry-body\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.azernews.az\/region\/138119.html\" rel=\"external\">According to an article in Azernews dated 25 September 2018<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbu.uz\" rel=\"external\">Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan<\/a> has denied rumors that it intends to issue a 100,000-som banknote. At present the largest denomination in circulation is the 50,000-som note (B215) introduced in 2017.<\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to an article in Azernews dated 25 September 2018, the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan has denied rumors that it intends to issue a 100,000-som banknote. At present the largest denomination in circulation is the 50,000-som note (B215) introduced in 2017.<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=2108\">Read More\u2026<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[115],"class_list":["entry","author-owen-linzmayer","post-2108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-central-asia","tag-uzbekistan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2108"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2109,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108\/revisions\/2109"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}