{"id":16701,"date":"2009-06-23T14:01:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-23T14:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test946983.live-website.com\/?p=16701"},"modified":"2019-12-03T23:35:05","modified_gmt":"2019-12-03T23:35:05","slug":"dominican-republic-new-date-2006-2000-peso-oro-note-confirmed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=16701","title":{"rendered":"Dominican Republic new date (2006) 2,000-peso oro note confirmed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/dominican_republic_2000_2006.00.00_p174_f.jpg alt=dominican_republic_2000_2006.00.00_p174_f.jpg height=198 width=470><\/p>\n<p class='has-larger-font-size'>\n<div class=\"blog-entry-body\">2,000 pesos oro (US$55.65), 2006. Like Pick 174a, but new date and new signatures.<\/p>\n<p>Courtesy of <a href=\"mailto:banknoteshop@gmx.net\" target=\"self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">banknoteshop@gmx.net<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2,000 pesos oro (US$55.65), 2006. Like Pick 174a, but new date and new signatures. Courtesy of banknoteshop@gmx.net.<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=16701\">Read More\u2026<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":16700,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[108],"class_list":["entry","author-owen-linzmayer","post-16701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-caribbean","tag-dominican-republic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16701"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16701\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16702,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16701\/revisions\/16702"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/16700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}