{"id":15612,"date":"2010-03-10T06:38:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-10T06:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test946983.live-website.com\/?p=15612"},"modified":"2019-12-03T23:19:09","modified_gmt":"2019-12-03T23:19:09","slug":"dominican-republic-new-date-2009-100-peso-oro-note-confirmed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=15612","title":{"rendered":"Dominican Republic new date (2009) 100-peso oro note confirmed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/dominican_republic_100_2009.00.00_p177b_sig.jpg alt=dominican_republic_100_2009.00.00_p177b_sig.jpg height=200 width=470><\/p>\n<p class='has-larger-font-size'>\n<div class=\"blog-entry-body\">100 pesos oro (US$2.75), 2009. Like Pick 177, but new date.<\/p>\n<p>Courtesy of <a href=\"mailto:banknoteshop@gmx.net\" target=\"self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">banknoteshop@gmx.net<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>100 pesos oro (US$2.75), 2009. Like Pick 177, but new date. Courtesy of banknoteshop@gmx.net.<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=15612\">Read More\u2026<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":15611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[108],"class_list":["entry","author-owen-linzmayer","post-15612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-caribbean","tag-dominican-republic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15612"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15613,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15612\/revisions\/15613"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/15611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}