{"id":14660,"date":"2010-11-05T14:32:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-05T14:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test946983.live-website.com\/?p=14660"},"modified":"2020-01-07T19:23:13","modified_gmt":"2020-01-07T19:23:13","slug":"belarus-language-changes-create-errors-on-old-notes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=14660","title":{"rendered":"Belarus language changes create errors on old notes (B125 and B132)"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\" \"\" \"\" \"\"<\/p>\n

According to an article on the Belarus Partisan dated 05.11.2010<\/a>, on 1 September 2010, new rules of Belarusian orthography came into force. According to the old rules, the correct spelling of the word \u201cfifty\u201d in Belarusian was \u201c\u043f\u044f\u0446\u044c\u0434\u0437\u0415\u0441\u044f\u0442,\u201d but under the new rules, it should be spelled \u201c\u043f\u044f\u0446\u044c\u0434\u0437\u042f\u0441\u044f\u0442,\u201d the difference being that the seventh character was the Cyrillic letter IE but is now the Cyrillic letter YA. As a result of these new rules, the existing 50- and 50,000-ruble notes (B125 and B132, respectively) dated 2000 now technically contain errors where the denominations are spelled out on the backs of the notes. Belarus National Bank<\/a> intends to correct these spelling errors when it issues new versions of these denominations, but there is no word yet on when that may be.<\/p>\n

Courtesy of Vitali Khaletski.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

According to an article on the Belarus Partisan dated 05.11.2010, on 1 September 2010, new rules of Belarusian orthography came into force. According to the old rules, the correct spelling of the word \u201cfifty\u201d in Belarusian was \u201c\u043f\u044f\u0446\u044c\u0434\u0437\u0415\u0441\u044f\u0442,\u201d but under the new rules, it should be spelled \u201c\u043f\u044f\u0446\u044c\u0434\u0437\u042f\u0441\u044f\u0442,\u201d the differenceRead More\u2026<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":23212,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[82,309],"class_list":["entry","author-owen-linzmayer","post-14660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-europe","tag-belarus","tag-error"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14660"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14660\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23214,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14660\/revisions\/23214"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/23212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}