{"id":14296,"date":"2011-02-04T11:50:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-04T11:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test946983.live-website.com\/?p=14296"},"modified":"2019-12-31T01:50:53","modified_gmt":"2019-12-31T01:50:53","slug":"bangladesh-new-sig-date-2010-100-taka-note-confirmed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=14296","title":{"rendered":"Bangladesh new sig\/date (2010) 100-taka note confirmed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/bangladesh_100_2010.00.00_b52g_sg10b_p49_sig.jpg alt=bangladesh_100_2010.00.00_b52g_sg10b_p49_sig.jpg height=198 width=470><\/p>\n<p class='has-larger-font-size'>\n<div class=\"blog-entry-body\">100 taka (US$1.40), 2010. Like P49, but new date and new signature (Atiur Rahman).<\/p>\n<p>Courtesy of Bill Stubkjaer.<\/p>\n<p><\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>100 taka (US$1.40), 2010. Like P49, but new date and new signature (Atiur Rahman). Courtesy of Bill Stubkjaer.<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=14296\">Read More\u2026<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":14295,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[338,20],"tags":[78],"class_list":["entry","author-owen-linzmayer","post-14296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-new-variety","category-south-asia","tag-bangladesh"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14296"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14297,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14296\/revisions\/14297"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/14295"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}