{"id":11152,"date":"2012-09-30T14:51:00","date_gmt":"2012-09-30T14:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test946983.live-website.com\/?p=11152"},"modified":"2020-01-07T05:35:42","modified_gmt":"2020-01-07T05:35:42","slug":"vietnam-10000-and-20000-dong-notes-on-cotton-to-be-withdrawn-01-01-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/?p=11152","title":{"rendered":"Vietnam cotton 10,000- and 20,000-dong notes (B337a and B338a) to be withdrawn 01.01.2013"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\" \"\" \"\" \"\"<\/p>\n

According to an article on The Voice of Vietnam dated 29 September 2012<\/a>, the State Bank of Vietnam<\/a> has announced that 10,000- and 20,000-dong (US$0.50 and $1, respectively) notes printed on cotton (B337a, \u00a0B340a, and B338a) will no longer be legal tender as of 1 January 2013, but may exchange them at SBV branches and other institutions. These denominations have been replaced by polymer notes (B343 and B344).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

According to an article on The Voice of Vietnam dated 29 September 2012, the State Bank of Vietnam has announced that 10,000- and 20,000-dong (US$0.50 and $1, respectively) notes printed on cotton (B337a, \u00a0B340a, and B338a) will no longer be legal tender as of 1 January 2013, but may exchangeRead More\u2026<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":23087,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[43],"class_list":["entry","author-owen-linzmayer","post-11152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-east-and-southeast-asia","category-polymer","tag-vietnam"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11152"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23091,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11152\/revisions\/23091"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/23087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banknotenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}